| Characteristic | Expansion candle | Retracement candle | Real-time identification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body size vs range | Large body — 60%+ of the total candle range, minimal wicks | Small body — under 40% of the range, wicks proportionally larger | Measure the body against the range as the candle forms: a large body closing in one direction = expansion in progress. |
| Close position within range | Bullish: close in the upper 25%; bearish: lower 25% — the delivery state is strongly directional | Close near the midpoint (40–60%) or in the opposing 25% — neutral or counter-directional state | Ask: is this candle closing near its high (expansion) or its midpoint (retracement)? The close position identifies the type instantly. |
| FVG creation vs FVG fill | Creates at least one C1-C2-C3 FVG — the displacement leaves a gap in the order book | Returns price into a prior FVG zone, filling it partially or fully; closes within the zone, not beyond the far boundary | The single most definitive signal: is this candle (as C2) leaving a gap — or entering one? |
| BOS vs no counter-BOS | Produces a BOS above the prior swing high — each expansion in a healthy Phase 3 makes a new higher high | Does NOT close below the prior swing low — that would be a CHoCH, not a retracement | Did this candle close below the most recent swing low? YES = CHoCH warning. NO = valid retracement candidate. |
| Volume character (index futures) | Higher volume — institutional conviction driving the displacement; volume expands with each leg | Declining volume — reduced counter-pressure, demand absorbing the pullback | On NQ/ES: rising volume on a counter-move = reversal warning; falling volume = healthy retracement. |
Example: 40-pip expansion → 14-pip retracement = 35%. The CE at 50% of the leg is never reached — sufficient institutional buy orders filled at the zone boundary alone. Action: the CE limit did not fill (partial rebalancing). Do not chase above the CE. Journal: “Shallow retracement — strong AMD quality signal. No fill — valid no-trade session.” Multiple shallow retracements in a week = exceptionally strong weekly AMD direction.
Example: 40-pip expansion → 16–24-pip retracement. The FVG CE at the leg midpoint fills — the most common depth in a normal Phase 3 and the scenario the Model 1/2 limit is designed for. Action: the limit fills; stop at the far boundary minus 2–3 pips; 50% partial at the PDH (IRL), trail the remainder.
Example: 40-pip expansion → 26–32-pip retracement. Demand concentrates at the deeper OTE levels rather than the CE; the far boundary sits near the 79% level of the leg. Action: the 62%/79% levels within the zone become the entry references; valid while no candle closes beyond the far boundary; stop unchanged at the far boundary minus 2–3 pips.
Example: 40-pip expansion → 33+ pips = 82%+. Either the “expansion” was inducement, or the AMD direction is changing (an HTF CHoCH may be forming). Action: pause and check three things — daily AMD intact (no daily CHoCH)? FVG fully mitigated (close beyond the far boundary)? HTF structure supportive? All intact and the stop untouched: hold. Any check fails: close and reassess. And if the stop is structurally placed at the far boundary: let it do its job — the 79%+ depth is the warning, never a reason to widen the stop.
| Expansion (pips) | Retracement (pips) | E/R ratio | AMD quality | ICT implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 10 | 4.0:1 | Excellent | High-conviction Phase 3. Shallow retracement — partial rebalancing likely; expect fast PDH delivery. |
| 40 | 16 | 2.5:1 | Strong | Healthy Phase 3, standard CE fill — the Model 1/2 limit fills; good probability of PDH delivery within the session. |
| 40 | 22 | 1.8:1 | Healthy | Normal delivery, deep-standard retracement; CE fill at ~55% of the leg. Viable entry. |
| 40 | 28 | 1.4:1 | Moderate | Deep retracement into the OTE zone (70%); price near the far boundary. Reduce confidence; verify the daily AMD. |
| 40 | 35 | 1.1:1 | Weak | Warning threshold exceeded (87.5%). Possible inducement — daily AMD reassessment required. |
| 20 | 18 | 1.1:1 | Very weak | Near-equal legs: not genuine Phase 3 — likely accumulation or inducement misread as delivery. |
| AMD phase | Price character | Expansion/retracement role | ICT action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 — Accumulation | Overlapping small-body candles; range-building, minimal displacement | No reference exists yet — no directional leg to measure against | Mark the range boundaries (future Judas targets). Do not apply the framework. Observe only. |
| Phase 2 — Judas sweep | Large directional candles in the WRONG direction; may create bearish FVGs; visually identical to Phase 3 expansion inverted | The framework does NOT apply. The Judas is manipulation, not delivery — applying it produces short entries from bearish Judas FVGs on a bullish day | Observe only. The bearish “expansion” candles are Phase 2 liquidity collection — the setup for the bullish Phase 3 that follows. No entries. |
| Phase 3 — Distribution | Alternating legs: large displacement (expansion) → smaller counter-move to the FVG CE (retracement) → next expansion | Applies exclusively here. Each expansion-retracement pair is one completed sub-delivery cycle | Limit at the FVG CE; stop at the far boundary; log the E/R ratio per pair; exit at the ERL or the kill zone close. |
It feels like the strongest signal — large body, momentum, a new high forming. It is the worst entry in the leg: the maximum price before the retracement, no FVG reference below (the gap only exists once C3 closes), no precise structural stop, and maximum risk of being stopped out before Phase 3 resumes. The expansion is the SIGNAL. The retracement is the ENTRY.
Phase 2 candles look identical to inverted Phase 3 expansion — and treating them as expansion produces bearish FVG “entries” in the sweep direction on a bullish day. The diagnostic is one question: is this expansion advancing in the AMD direction or against it? With it = Phase 3 (enter on the retracement). Against it = Judas (observe only, never enter).
The reference is always the most recent expansion leg — never the cumulative Phase 3 distance. A delivery 40 pips off the MSS whose most recent leg is 10 pips, followed by an 8-pip retracement, is an 80% retracement of the recent leg (warning breach) — not a comforting 20% of the full move. The cumulative misread produces false confidence exactly when caution is required.
A close below the prior swing low on a bullish day is a CHoCH — a structural break, not a deep pullback. A genuine retracement reverses inside the FVG zone without breaking the prior swing low. The difference is a single candle close, and that close is the invalidation signal: reassess the AMD immediately rather than holding in hope that Phase 3 resumes.
Lio has traded ICT and Smart Money Concepts on forex majors and US indices since 2021 and built LiquiditySweeps.com to teach the framework the way it should be learned: in sequence, on real charts, with free live tools instead of paid indicators. Every article on this site follows the same rule — nothing gets published that wouldn’t survive a trade review.
About All articles Mentorship